Tuesday, May 5, 2026

WHO WROTE WHAT, WHERE, WHEN:


This post was removed from subreddit r/UnbannableChristian by Reddit. In future, all posts at the site will also appear here. -kyrie


                   Go to UnbannableChristian
where the buck stops

The oriignal version of this post was removed by REDDIT with no explanation. 

Edited by Metaphysical Catholic

We did a lot of work on the history of Diocletian and Constantine and we could see how much it informed how the Roman church and became dominant and totally effed-up what Jesus said with their Second Temple Judaistic version of "Christianity."

It's sickening that it's called Judeo-Christian as much as Jesus, Paul, Peter, John all rejected any ties to 2nd Temple Judaism. So K asked me to look at some material. This is part of it. Judge for yourself, I don't do in-depth anymore. She'll be doing a video I'm petty sure.

If you don't know what the Documentary Hypothesis is, use the link here. Previously all dating of Torah/Tanakh titles were taken from the writings themselves. This all sounds to me like what's going on today to erase any of the gospel.

Re: the “Old Testament” - this from a decent overview of the Documentary Hypothesis in Wikipedia:

The consensus around the classical documentary hypothesis has now faltered.[5] This was triggered in large part by the influential publications of John Van Seters, Hans Heinrich Schmid, and Rolf Rendtorff in the mid-1970s,[7] who argued that J was to be dated no earlier than the time of the Babylonian captivity (597–539 BCE)

J is the first author, the writer of Genesis and most of the Torah in the hypothesis. When K found out we don't have any Hebrew at all from before the exile, it supported her intuition I call theory.

The general trend in recent scholarship is to recognize the final form of the Torah as a literary and ideological unity, based on earlier sources, likely completed during the Persian period (539–333 BCE).[40][41] A minority of scholars would place its final compilation somewhat later, however, in the Hellenistic period (333–164 BCE).[42]

Kyrie's Intuition/Theory now being forwarded by recent schaolars: Deuteronomy was made from whole cloth during the Babaylonian exile. (605 B.C. to  538 B.C.) The commonly accepted dates derive from the common practice of Biblical scholars making the document they are assessing the source of the evidence they are basing assessment on: 

Arguments by Scholars for the existence of most OT books Before the Babylonian ExileEvidence for Pre-Exilic Existence:

  • The "Book of the Law" (2 Kings 22-23): Biblical narrative states that a "book of the law" was discovered in the Jerusalem Temple during renovations under King Josiah (c. 622 BCE). This scroll prompted major religious reforms focusing on centralizing worship in Jerusalem, which aligns with the central theme of Deuteronomy.

The Book of the Law was identified as Deuterononomy dated to 1400s B.C.  The copy was found during the reign of King Josiah 640-609 B.C., about 100 years before the Babylonian exile began, according to 2Kings dated to 561 B.C. right in the middle of the Babylonian exile. Ed.
  • Assyrian Treaty Parallels: The covenantal language and curses in Deuteronomy 28 strongly resemble 7th-century BCE Assyrian vassal treaties, such as those of Esarhaddon, suggesting it was written while Assyria dominated the region.

  • The Deuteronomistic History: The books of Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings use the language and theology of Deuteronomy. Since these books appear to have been compiled or written, at least in their first edition, around the time of Josiah's reign, the source material (Deuteronomy) must have existed.

The books mentioned are widely dated, and all are dated according to their own internal text refrences. 
  • Geographical and Political Setting: The book describes a "Northern" tradition—likely coming from refugees fleeing to Judah after 722 BCE—that was integrated into Judean law during the time of Hezekiah or Josiah. 

This writer knows of no evidence of "refugees" in southern Israel fleeing anywhere. The Assyrians attacked the city, certainly the locals got outof the ay, but once the Assyrians won and sen their own people to adminstrate from the city of Samaria, there would be no reason for the Israelites to not return to their homes. 

The political climate would have nmade it very difficult to just run down to Judea and expect to we welcoed. The Judeans had been staying out of the conflict and were at odds with the Israel. 

The early version of the Documentary Hypothesis held that Deuteronomy was supposed to come first, an ancient version of Law redacted by D, the "Deuteronomist". LATER, P represents a possible group of Priests who edited/redacted the other books. All based on accepting the validity of the "discovery" of the "Book of the Law" —a factoid tossed off in two verses of 2 Kings 22— which led to a total revision of the pratice of Judaism and Temple sacrafice and shifted authority to the exhilic Powers that Be, who did the rewriting. 

In this way, all the writings up to Esther were validated by the scholarly assumption they depended on this ancient, redisovered scroll that had Josiah tearing his clothes in an agony of guilt that they'd been doing it all wrong. 

The original theory is D was a single author of Deuteronomy and P represents the Priestly writer of the later books that cement this ideas as ancient and given by God to the Torah Elders. And the similarity in language is just from using D, not being D.

Here is a list of classic datings of OT books: 

Primary sources Theology and the City and Jesus Alive

The Pentateuch (Books of the Law) 

  • Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy: Written by Moses (traditionally) between 1445–1405 B.C.. 

Historical Books

  • Joshua: c. 1405–1385 B.C.

  • Judges: c. 1100–1043 B.C.

  • Ruth: c. 1030–1010 B.C.

  • 1 & 2 Samuel: c. 740–686 B.C.

  • 1 & 2 Kings: c. 561–538 B.C.

  • 1 & 2 Chronicles: c. 450–430 B.C.

  • Ezra & Nehemiah: c. 457–400 B.C.

  • Esther: c. 473–331 B.C. 

Poetic & Wisdom Books

  • Job: Uncertain; often considered the earliest, possibly 2000–1800 B.C., or written much later.

  • Psalms: Compiled over a long period, mostly 1410–450 B.C..

  • Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon: c. 970–930 B.C. (Solomonic era). 

Major Prophets

  • Isaiah: c. 700–681 B.C.

  • Jeremiah: c. 627–570 B.C.

  • Lamentations: c. 608–586 B.C.

  • Ezekiel: c. 597–570 B.C.

  • Daniel: c. 605–530 B.C. 

Minor Prophets

  • Hosea: c. 750–710 B.C.

  • Joel: c. 596–586 B.C. (some place earlier, c. 835 B.C.)

  • Amos: c. 762–750 B.C.

  • Obadiah: c. 590 B.C. (some place earlier, c. 850 B.C.)

  • Jonah: c. 775–798 B.C.

  • Micah: c. 740–711 B.C.

  • Nahum: c. 662–626 B.C.

  • Habakkuk: c. 626–605 B.C.

  • Zephaniah: c. 630–625 B.C.

  • Haggai: c. 520 B.C.

  • Zechariah: c. 520–470 B.C.

  • Malachi: c. 433–400 B.C. 

YET, AGAIN, THERE ARE NO EXTANT COPIES OR FRAGMENTS OF THESE BOOKS FROM BEFORE THE EXILE.  

Tuesday, April 28, 2026

SPIRITUAL OCD, aka: One Way Syndrome, the Petrified Path


Yes, I did have 3 titles and couldn't decide so I used them all!


While reading something by a youngish, dedicated medium, I came across a reference to them talking to a friend about aspects of spiritual development. The friend shared that experiences with psilocybin were helping him advance spiritually.

Young medium took umbrage at this, saying that equating drug-induced hallucinations with spiritual visions minimized true mystical experience. Then they went on to say that ceremonial drug use amongst native peoples, because it was done in the context of a religious practice, could certainly generate personal growth, but laying up in the bed and doing shrooms is not the same as having a spiritual revelation during a religious ritual.

 

WHY NOT?

Young Medium is OCD and was raised a Christian and went on about the body being "a temple" and the spiritual journey has no "shortcuts." I'm wondering why the native peoples' bodies aren't temples or do they become that when they are zoned out on whatever hallucinogen is native to their ecosystem?

And they taking a religious shortcut because they aren't a 20-something American kid in La Jolla?

Which brings me to Mary and Martha, as so many things do. Maybe it wasn't just that Martha had all the serving to do, because she would have had servants. It seems like her real issue was Mary's scandalous behavior, way outside the acceptable lines for a decent Hebrew woman. She was sitting with the men, at the feet of an  unmarried adult man

And besides, that Jesus couldn't be some great thing if He didn't correct her and send her to the kitchen! So she confronted Jesus, the honored guest, not Mary. Which is pretty much also a serious cultural faux pas. If she wanted male support she could have asked her brother. Instead:
40 Martha, burdened with much serving, came to him and said, “Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me by myself to do the serving? Tell her to help me.”

41The Lord said to her in reply, “Martha, Martha, you are anxious and worried about many things. 
That's from Luke 10. Jesus knew her thoughts, of course and all about her. The first thing He says is that she is anxious about many things. 

Young Medium is also anxious about many things. Like defining a true spiritual experience. Like not offending the liberal reader who might think he was criticizing Native Americans. Like maybe thinking he was "doing as much work as possible" every day, as he said at one point, and mushroom boy was getting the same benefit? Like the men working the fields all day getting the same wages as the ones who only worked one hour? Like the prodigal son getting a party and the hard-working, always obedient son didn't?

Sunday, November 23, 2025

OK. he oldest post is from Nov 2011 when I first wrote pages, but my profile says I've only been here a year.



I was going to put a surprised face on here but I saw the horses first and I love the picture. I changed my screen name last year and then I found out of you edit an old post it says the date you update and now I'm sort of frozen in posting anything.

So I'm not touching the pages or adding all the stuff that happened later. I invited a guest. There are I think 2 big NDE sites where you can post NDEs. There aren't any big miracle/vision sites. If there are they're tied to some denominational lot of demon theory and cosmic death coma and... 

I have no home! (But here) I was going to post a funny crying picture but it would probably just be a bunch of marigolds.


Or one.

THE CHURCH NEVER SAYS ANYONE IS GOING TO HELL


I put the title in all caps because I don't want anyone to miss the point. For all we know, Hell (whatever that is in Eternity) is empty.

Now, I'll tell you something even more surprising:

Jesus never spoke about Hell that we know of. Never said the word that anyone recorded.

But that can't be right, can it?  The word "hell" is right there in Scripture!

The English word is. But not the Greek word. The Gospels are written in Greek.

Tuesday, October 28, 2025

I was Just Going to Bed when I Stopped to close this Blog and realized, it's still my favorite place to be...

It's the colors and layout and familiarity and it doesn't demand anything of me or nag me about monetization. I'm writing about this in r/unbannablechristian but falling asleep in my chair.

So I'll leave it here. People will get it or not. 



Talk to y'all soon. 






Tuesday, October 8, 2024

IT'S STILL OCTOBER, BUT IT'S 2025

The post from last October is below but the podcast is pretty much gone. Or will be all gone shortly, as I reverted to a free account and Buzzsprout only keeps those up for 90 days.

It was just too much time when I had so much other stuff to do and other issues to deal with. 

Listen, I know how bad it's getting, I know it will get worse and unbelievable darkness will come. Hard to believe what's going on now. But this is the time of faith and more hope than ever before, because this is that predicted darkness that precedes the greatest possible Light.

We have to be kinder, less fearful, more compassionate and generous. Stop judging - this from the one for whom judgement is my most stubborn sin - focus on those around you, caring for yourself and them. Including the ones you don't like.

Get your flu shot and plan to live long and well.  

Your Metaphysical Christian Contemplative - you are beloved

 

from Oct 2024: 

I was going to do two new podcasts this week-end and then for the first time, I clicked one of the names of the platforms that have the episodes, like Spotify and found out - YOU CAN'T HEAR THEM.


So, now they are are all much louder, listen well (I checked) but when you increase those dBs, suddenly a lot of hidden clicks and hissses emerge. (Yes, "hisses" actually has 4 esses, sometimes more, when I say it.) So, that's what took so long.

Today I'll record as soon as everyone is in bed. A lot of my visions are about the way things work between Time and Eternity. There's all this guessing and assuming. I don't think the world really needs one more contemplative telling them everyone eventually will be oned with God or that He is Love. But what happens and how and why is a lot of what Jesus talked about and people are missing the point.

There was a question on Galatians 6:8 in r/ChristianUniversalism today and part of my answer was:

The thing most people don't think about is that we are eternal beings, not after we die, right now. The Kingdom is right here, among us. We receive from Eternity through the Spirit, graces and information in this life.

The very fact that visionaries and mystics exist, that miracles happen, that consolations are given, is testimony to this essential fact about the way the Universe works. So first, I think I'll put aside the series in the Tribulation and just do "The Way Things Work."

Jesus talked about that all the time, He only spoke of tribulation and Parousia a couple times. So I guess this should come first. And - it leads right into the other.


Monday, March 2, 2015

WHAT I BELIEVE

As you can see, I haven't posted here in quite a while.  The comments section of the previous very simple template didn't allow for replying to individual posts and made exchange of ideas quite difficult. I felt like I needed to update things a bit, so here is the new, simplified version of the blog. I hope everyone finds it easier to comment and connect.

I am a proponent of Truth. I'm not sure I always know what that is, when written with a capital "T."  I am also, however,  proponent of facts and freedom.

The Corporate Roman Catholic Church, that is, the physical hierarchical set of persons that take it upon themselves to make rules for the rest of humanity is corrupt. Power corrupts. That's inevitable. Some Popes have been great villains, committed heinous, despicable acts. True for all ranks of persons in the cRCC.  Bishops, having so much power, are especially vulnerable. Which is not to deny the presence of great spiritual warriors in the cRCC. There has also always been Light.

This is no attack on the Church.  It's just a statement of fact.  What is also factual, IMO, is that each of us is responsible for our own salvation. If you are not following Christ, not feeding the hungry and clothing the naked, refraining from judgement and praying in a closet and taking the last seat at the table, you cannot expect to be excused by God because some corporate body, a Bishop, a self-appointed expert on Christianity, said it was okay.

It's not okay. Not because I say it's not okay, but because Christ did. Our Savior didn't tell us to go to Mass every Sunday and Holy Day of Obligation. He didn't tell us to confess or not masturbate or say a Rosary.

He told us to love one another.  Serve one another. Feed, clothe, visit the imprisoned. Pray. Pray. Pray. He gave us the Eucharist.  He didn't say it was the exclusive province of anyone. He didn't say who should and shouldn't receive.

It seems quite simple and anyone or anything that represses the simple message of Christ is just another in that nest of vipers blocking access to the fullness of life in God forever.


This is what I believe. I wanted to make it perfectly clear. 

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Our History-Making Pope





CNN PAGE ON THE POPE'S RESIGNATION

It occurred to me a while ago that the Pope is a very old man isolated amongst a savage pride of lions: powerful, ambitious and corrupt men.

Telling no one, he planned a public announcement: he will resign.
As of Feb. 11, 2013, 67 of the 118 cardinal electors were appointed by Benedict. The rest were appointed by John Paul II. 

From: "Papal Transition" America Magazine  The vast majority of these Cardinals are under 80 years of age.   Because we are weeks from the date of resignation, all Cardinals have time to make their way to Rome by the resignation date so that the Conclave can begin at once.   All, we assume, will call upon the Pope before he retires.  All, I hope, will know the preference of the Pope for his successor.  Today, Vatican news announced the Pope will have a "farewell gathering" with the Cardinals on February 28th.

This Pope wants someone in place before Easter, and the Cardinals are already going to be winging their way to Vatican City.  What was most interesting in the story, was this:

Also during the course of the question and answer session following the briefing proper, Fr. Lombardi reaffirmed that Pope Benedict will be returning to live a life of prayer and reflection in the Vatican... 
I'll bet. It's like a clockwork, a well-thought plan to shepherd us through the coming tribulations, executed at speed and under the time demands of the Lenten season to get a Pope in place long before Easter.  .

In a recent address (which I'm having trouble finding a link to) Pope Benedict XVI said that the Church had plenty of structure, what the Church lacks is enough spirituality.  With his comments on the importance of the novissimi as he interpreted the 3rd secret of Fatima, I'm wondering when someone will trust us enough to let us in on the actual Secret and finally, over 50 years later, tell us what Mary wanted us to know.

It's going to be an interesting 8 weeks.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

The "Smaller Church" Takes Shape



Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI), from his book Faith and the Future

Then Cardinal Ratzinger wrote this in 1971.  Today (Oct 18th, 2012) over 40 years later, this article appeared: Vienna archdiocese to cut parishes by 75 per cent  which was referenced in a CAF thread of the same name.  Notice this is happening in Vienna, in the country of the Pope's birth and greatest influence.  Here's an excerpt:
The archdiocese’s 660 parishes will be merged over the next decade into around 150 larger parishes, each served by three to five priests and offering regular Masses.

Mr PrĂ¼ller told the American Catholic News Service that falling numbers of clergy and laity had made the changes necessary. He said smaller affiliated communities within the parishes will be run by lay volunteers authorised to conduct the Liturgy of the Word. 
PrĂ¼ller said archdiocesan bishops would draft the new parish boundaries and steps for implementing the reorganisation by January 1.

“The Church’s mission of apostolate and evangelisation isn’t just the responsibility of parish priests, but of the whole community of baptised and confirmed. If this reorganisation creates more vibrant Christian communities, praying, celebrating Mass, conducting mission and helping the needy together, then it could offer a model for Church reforms throughout Europe.”

“This is about a new cooperation between priests and laity from their common Christian vocation,” the cardinal told the news conference, which was reported by Austria’s Kathpress news agency. 
“We have to free ourselves of the traditional image that the Church is present only where there’s a priest and stress the common priesthood of all baptised,” he said.
The operative word is "if." Sounds good. Sounds like something I'd like.  But people who want to run things are usually the last people you want to run things and the lay people who show up are going to not necessarily be anyone we'd want leading us. The average parishioner will just be glad those Communion services are so short and still won't know any theology. 

Who's really going to end up in charge?

Threat Assessment


"In order that the world might know His anger, the Heavenly Father is preparing to inflict a great chastisement on all mankind. ... akita 


 ...it should be sufficient for all Christians to know this: if there is a message in which it is written that the oceans will flood whole areas of the earth, and that from one moment to the next millions of people will perish... Pope John Paul II on why the 3rd Secret of Fatima has not been revealed






Then-Cardinal Ratzinger in a 1984 interview in Jesus magazine, about the 3rd Secret of Fatima:


"Cardinal Ratzinger, have you read what is called the Third Secret of Fatima: i.e., the one that Sister Lucia had sent to Pope John XXIII and which the latter did not wish to make known and consigned to the Vatican archives?" 




"Yes, I have read it." 



"Why has it not been revealed?" 



"Because, according to the judgement of the Popes, it adds nothing new to what a Christian must know concerning what derives from Revelation: i.e., a radical call for conversion; the absolute importance of history; the dangers threatening the faith and the life of the Christian, and therefore of the world. And then the importance of the novissimi.  If it is not made public - at least for the time being - it is in order to prevent religious prophecy from being mistaken for a quest for the sensationalism. But the things contained in this Third Secret correspond to what has been announced in Scripture and has been said again and again in many other Marian apparitions, first of all that of Fatima in what is already known of what its message contains: conversion and penitence are the essential conditions for salvation."

So, here's the threat assessment:

Something big and bad is coming.  John Paul II characterized it correctly: millions will die very suddenly. So, I have a question: HOW IS THIS DIFFERENT FOR YOU OR I THAN WHAT WILL HAPPEN, ANYWAY?

If we are not among the dead, times will indeed be very hard and we may envy the dead very much.  But the fact is, your death or mine can come at any moment.  So all this sudden death is really not the point,  JPII is correct:
 "Here is the remedy against this evil.  Pray, pray, and ask for nothing more.  Leave everything else to the Mother of God." 
Or, yanno, her Son: 
198 On one occasion the Lord said to me, 
My daughter, your confidence and love restrain My justice, 
and I cannot inflict punishment because you hinder Me from doing so. 
Oh, how great is the power of a soul filled with confidence!  
-the Diary of Saint Faustina

Do you only pray when there is a problem?  Aren't we called to prayer in all cases, all days and times? If no one knows the day or hour, the world can end before I finish typing this line.